A Woman's Guide to Sensual Film

Archive for August, 2008

End of Summer Sensuals for Women

Do people really write blogs in the summer?! Watching films late in the evening to track down new sensual movies for women is about as much indoor activity as I can fathom. (It sounds like fun work, right? But it is tough going to find films that qualify. If you are reading this and have one in mind, go immediately to “Contact Us” and send in your suggestion to contactus@barefootaphrodite.com . We need more sensual films!!!)

The New York Times had a wonderful article today on how some of their writers plan to spend the last few days of summer and some of the suggestions are sensual indeed. It’s a sensual time–fading sunshine with a nip in the air promising seasons to come, happy memories of vacations gone by, a wistfulness for them but with a rush of new energy with the lifting of summer heat. What follows is just one of the stories about celebrating these last days of the season. I chose a story about enjoying film, not a sensual film but a sensual experience because of a letting go of hang ups in exchange for pure pleasure no matter how silly in the eyes of others. (Don’t be afraid that your choice of films is not sensual–sensuality is about you and you alone.) Think of your own way to celebrate the sensuals of summer:

What’s Happening to Me? 

I confess. I enjoyed “Mamma Mia!” Twice. 

I can’t quite explain it. I’m a man in his late 40s whose aesthetic taste runs to the detailed, the dank, the depressing. I tend to mull the glass half-empty, and I’m fine with that, thank you very much. So how could I be taken in by cotton-candy girl-power set to an Abba soundtrack? It defies natural law. But to those of us a little too weighed down with adult worries, “Mamma Mia!” on screen and stage may be a pinch in the potbelly, a reminder to lighten up already, for goodness’ sake. 

I’m a big Stellan Skarsgard fan, and the thought of a singing and dancing Meryl, Her Streepness, was enough to send me to the movie. What I found was like a charming Shakespearean comedy that hardly paused to take itself seriously. “Mamma Mia!” — with its hoot of a real Greek chorus — has the potential, at least in my book, for “Rocky Horror Picture Show” cult status. 

Ms. Streep, apparently determined to show off her loosey-goosey side in this feminist-tinged romance, seems to be having a blast in the lead role of Donna. What a pleasure to see her in the credit sequence, belting out “Waterloo” with her mature (kind of) co-stars, all happy not to have to play the hunks and babes. Skip to next paragraph 

The movie sent me to the Cadillac Winter Garden Theater on Broadway, where “Mamma Mia!” is still playing after almost seven years. I admit, I had my worries. Must have fun, I programmed myself. 

My concern seemed justified at first. The stage show has a simple but plain set, as useful as a wrench and only a bit more attractive, and some performances were hardly less mechanical. Others were rusty. The plot, primarily about a young woman’s desire to discover her father’s identity (there are three possibilities) before she gets married, clunked along. Where a camera cut found humor, this three-dimensional live show somehow lost a dimension. 

And yet. Gina Ferrall, as Donna’s sturdy friend Rosie, quickly became the audience’s best pal. Carrie Manolakos, as the dad-seeking Sophie, glowed with a convincing belief in her fairy tale. As Donna’s lost love, Sam, Christopher Shyer — well, he could sing! And though it happened rarely, there was the joy of watching a big ensemble of gyrating everyfolk, a bunch of dancing queens, kings, princes and princesses. 

By the time “Waterloo” came around at the curtain call, I was grinning and clapping with the packed house. We who love “Mamma Mia!” may be a select tribe, but we are a happy one. DAVID DeWITT  

 

 

Excercising the Sensual

I was recently reminded of how referring to the sensuality of women and sensual movies for women can bring on a glazed over look in conversation or even a look of fear. I’ve also been encouraged to abandon the Barefoot Aphrodite logo because it is too “provacotive,” too sexual. But the original intention of the site was to give women a film option to porn, beyond the “chick flick” (although certainly many of the selections would be considered “chick flicks” and there’s nothing wrong with that!!!), a more fulfilling film experience that might lead to the development of our senses or even to sexual pleasure (as I noted in my review of “The Painted Veil“–a highly sensory but hardly sexually explicit film–after watching I wanted to jump into bed with my husband!). Keep that in mind when you select a film from our archives. Think about how the movie makes you feel–sense smells, sounds, visual images, the feel of objects/people. The idea is to extend the experience of a good sensual film–part of this happens naturally but part can be encouraged by awareness. Sensualize!

Barefoot Aphrodites Weigh In on Sensual Men, II

I asked our team of reviewers to look at our movie archives and think about the men that appear in our sensual films for women. I then asked them to choose the actors they find sensual and explain why and then describe what type of men in film they find sensual in general. You can find BA reviewer Alexandra’s response in an earlier entry. Teresa responds:
Sam Neill (Sirens, Piano): Sam Neill can be very sensual (PBS series Reilly, Ace of Spies) – when he is, for me it’s his voice, and the lines along his jaw, and his intelligence or appearance of thinking inwardly. Actually, Harvey Keitel is the sensual one in Piano – loooves his woman and knows how to make her “happy.”

Viggo Mortenson (History of Violence, Walk on the Moon): Viggo Mortenson is very sensual – it’s that beautiful but masculine face. Actually, he appears to be very concerned about women – making them happy – or being good, doing the right thing. I think somehow he communicates that given a choice, he’d hang w/ the ladies rather than with the dudes – in a masculine way.
Johnny Depp (Benny and Joon, Don Juan DeMarco) is somehow very sensual while having a very boyish look.  I think it’s because he just has a magnetism that comes through on the screen.  Ordinarily he would not be my type, but I always end up watching him closely- and liking him - in a film.

Richard Gere (Shall We Dance, Unfaithful) is decidedly unsensual to me. He has an air about him that makes him look like he Thinks he’s sexy. Un unh. As a matter of fact, I think a requirement for sensuous male for me is entirely unaffected and natural in his attractiveness to the opposite sex – more he (a sensual male for me) is truly interested in women – not just trying to get their attention.
George Clooney (Out of Sight) – I love the man and think he is smart, sexy, and brave, but somehow there’s always a veneer so he seems a bit cardboard so not sensual for me.

Colin Firth (P&P) – not.

James Spader (Secretary) – afraid to say it almost, but Somehow he is sensual. Probably because he’s just a little bit scary. I think somehow he communicates a serious thinker or maybe he just appears to be really intense about whatever he is doing.

Mickey Rourke (9 ½ Weeks) – had so so much sensual potential in Diner and in this movie, but then he had to go and ruin it all with the poor poor movies and the face lifts. Sigh. What made him sensual was definitely not the brain, but his lips – the way he looked at women, and the appearance of trying hard to be good though it mostly was very hard.

William Hurt (Body Heat) – not sensual – a bit too blond and thespian for me. I think he’s a good actor, though and try to catch all his movies.

Daniel Craig (Bond, James Bond) – oh yeah, sensual, at least as Bond. And who can say why, with his big ears.  Jury still out – maybe it’s the director or Bond character.
Hugh Jackman (Someone Like You) – not for me – I don’t see any depth.
Mel Gibson (Year of Living Dangerously) – very sensual in Year of Living Dangerously (and Bounty). Mel has real potential to be a sensual male lead when he gets a good role with a good director, much, for me, like Russell Crowe. He is well intentioned, intense, living very much in the moment, and likes smart women.

Robert Redford (Electric Horseman) – a good man, but entirely too cardboard on the screen to be sensual for me.

Joaquin Pheonix (Walk the Line) – not at all sensual for me – too young and too scary.
Anthony LaPaglia (Lantana) – looks too much like your average business man to be sensual for me.
Robert Mitchum (Ryan’s Daughter) – Robert Mitchum has a whole lot of sensual potential, but not in this movie. The characteristics I see as sensual are big chest, deep voice, and the way he kisses – but again, not in this movie.

Jeremy Irons (Stealing Beauty, French Lieutenant’s Woman) – I love Jeremy Irons, and he clearly is a thinking man, but I don’t find him sensual. He comes across as too into himself, I think, maybe, to have that type of charisma. I’ll watch him in most anything, though, and am never disappointed.
Christopher Plummer (Sound of Music) – oh yes, very sensual. He’s an amazing actor, so he really becomes whomever he is portraying, but I love his voice and the way he looks at women.  Good intentioned, but he also can’t help himself.
Gael Garcia-Bernal (Mexican—Y Tu Mama Tambien) – incredibly sensual – a Beautiful face, loves the women, comes across as a good person with passions that can lead him astray.
Giancarlo Giannini (Italian–Swept Away) – yes, very expressive face and handsome, but I don’t find him sensual – possibly a cultural thing, especially for this movie.
Rolf Lassgard (Swedish–Under the Sun) – now here’s a man I find totally unsensual on the surface – large, blond, not particularly handsome – but in this movie because he completely inhabits the character, I fell completely for him. A sweet, good man.
Massimo Troisi, Philippe Noiret  (Italian—Il Postino—the postman/the poet) – I’ll give them both European looking, but not sensual for me in this movie and I do not know them from other films. The older was more just a symbol rather than a person and the younger, maybe the same thing, but too gaunt and too inexperienced to be sensual.

…when all is said and done, looks like I like a guy who likes the women, is deep down a good person, and who just can’t help themselves when falling for someone…   

  

“Take Your Clothes Off”

You would think that a film that features the line “Take your clothes off” (a straight forward and usually successful seduction technique of the Daniel Day-Lewis character, Tomas) would definitely lean towards the sensual…and “The Unbearable Lightness of Being” (1988) certainly does. It has an attention to detail–especially of the human body, seen through the camera of a photographer, seen through the eyes of a man who cannot resist the physical charms of women, seen through the eyes of women who are drawn to each other, jealous of each other and who share an artistic vision–that is very sensual. But in the end, there is a coldness about the film, its characters and (especially) the sexual encounters that makes the viewer feel just that–that they are a viewer, observing and dissecting rather than feeling. It is too bad because there seems to be such a wealth of feeling, beauty and sexuality in the film that it is disappointing to be left feeling very little.

Sensual Films Bits and Pieces

Some films can be dismissed very quickly as not meeting the mark for a Barefoot Aphrodite stamp of approval as a sensual film for women. “Guantanamera” (1995)–a seemingly low-budget, overacted Cuban romantic comedy/political farce–is one of them. But, as is true for many films that are not sensual overall, there are some sensual elements that are right on the mark. First, there is the theme song for the movie which is sung to narrate sections of the film by a woman with a strong, husky voice–you do not want to mess with this woman! Then there is the actress, Mirtha Ibbara, who plays the wife of an insensitive, self-centered undertaker. While many of the actors are over-the-top and unbelievable, Ibbarra simply glows as an older woman whose beauty is in her kindness and depth of feeling. (There is a nice “I know you” glance between her and a former student that flashes back in black and white to her as a teacher receiving a love note.) Unfortunately, neither the husband (Carlos Cruz) nor the love interest (Raul Eguren) are any match for Ibbarra so there is no real sensual tension–it’s hard to believe this jewel of a woman should end up with either of these two!

 Another sensual side note is Ashley Judd. When I watched “Come Early Morning” (2006), I thought it must have been made long before Judd became Hollywoodified as she is in a Barefoot Aphrodite selection, “Someone Like You” (2001). She looks very much like her younger self in “Ruby in Paradise” (1993)–beautiful in a very natural, pure way. While the film doesn’t come together sensually, the relationships between the Judd character, Lucy, and her roommate (Laura Prepon), protective bar buddy, distant father, and a love interest are all gentle and true–very sensual in my book.

 

Be Wary of Sensual Films For Women That Disappoint!

Last night I sat down to what I thought was a film with Holly Hunter and Richard Gere–two of my favorite sensual actors–the comedy “Once Around” (1991). When broken-hearted Renata, Holly Hunter’s character, first sees sales success story, Sam Sharpe, he is standing on a rock in a white suit, looking out over the ocean at sunset: her heart stops. I thought for sure I was in for a light, romantic, sensual film. In the next scene, however, you meet Sam Sharpe–not Richard Gere but Richard Dreyfuss! My mistake! And a very sensual disappointment. Richard Dreyfuss may be a good actor but he rarely (if ever?) plays a sensual character and certainly is not a sensual man in my book. To top it off, his character was a horrible, inappropriate, crude salesman who supposedly sweeps Renata off her feet while totally alienating her entire family. And we are supposed to believe that he is the love of Renata’s life. Not believable and certainly not sensual. On the other hand, Danny Aiello and Gena Rowlands as Renata’s parents give the film a slight sensual heartbeat in their elegance and love for each other and their family. And Danny Aiello can sing to me any time! Maybe worth watching if you can bear Richard Dreyfuss in full on Dreyfuss mode but not close to being a sensual film selection!